For enhanced safety, the front and middle seat shoulder belts of the Toyota Sienna are height-adjustable to accommodate a wide variety of driver and passenger heights. A better fit can prevent injuries and the increased comfort also encourages passengers to buckle up. The Kia Carnival doesn’t offer height-adjustable middle seat belts.
With its standard Pre-Collision System with Pedestrian Detection, the Toyota Sienna is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Kia Carnival, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|
Sienna |
Carnival |
Overall Evaluation |
ACCEPTABLE |
MARGINAL |
|
Crossing Child - DAY |
|
12 MPH |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH |
-21 MPH |
-13 MPH |
|
Crossing Adult - NIGHT |
|
12 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-10 MPH |
12 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-6 MPH |
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-13 MPH |
25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-5 MPH |
|
Parallel Adult - NIGHT |
|
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-24 MPH |
25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-23 MPH |
37 MPH Brights |
-27 MPH |
-18 MPH |
37 MPH Low beams |
-24 MPH |
-19 MPH |
Warning Issued-Low beams |
1.6 sec |
1.4 sec |
The Sienna has a standard Secondary Collision Brake, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Carnival doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
The Sienna offers all-wheel drive to maximize traction under poor conditions, especially in ice and snow. The Carnival doesn’t offer all-wheel drive.
The Toyota Sienna comes with a standard Panoramic View Monitor, while the Kia Carnival doesn’t offer a camera washer, requiring manual cleaning.
Both the Sienna and the Carnival have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Toyota Sienna is safer than the Kia Carnival:
|
Sienna |
Carnival |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
175 |
250 |
Chest Compression |
.6 inches |
.8 inches |
Neck Injury Risk |
48% |
50.7% |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
448/220 lbs. |
632/305 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Toyota Sienna is safer than the Carnival:
|
Sienna |
Carnival |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Torso Max Deflection |
.83 in |
1.14 in |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Pelvis Force |
736 lbs. |
1071 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
18 |
186 |
Neck Tension |
134 lbs. |
245 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Shoulder Deflection |
.98 in |
2.01 in |
Shoulder Force |
312 lbs. |
357 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
.71 in |
1.97 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
7 MPH |
13 MPH |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Pelvis Force |
625 lbs. |
892 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |